The end of the generation debate?

There are few topics that generate more corridor conversations and opinions than the impact of the different generations in the workplace. Silent Generation, Baby boomer, X, Y, Z etc have stereotyped people of different ages to behave in a particular way. I'm not a convert to the generational debate. Here are two of the main reasons why I'm a sceptic:

1. It oversimplifies people dynamics by ignoring the role of individual differences on people's behaviour in the workplace, and
2. It's a red herring as I see people use the generational definitions as a scapegoat to explain and accept trouble in the workplace...rather than directly addressing the interpersonal issues themselves.

Recent research summarised in the AFR BOSS magazine (May 2008 issue) found that the generation gap isn't really that wide. What's more, it was found that the environment that different generations thrive on is remarkably similar. As the findings state:

"it involves immediate and constructive feedback; leaders who are caring and aware; inclusive, engaging, non-passive behaviour; being continually informed about the business; having personal goals linked to business goals; new experience; being coached; and sharing the less interesting tasks".

Food for thought.